<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theory: Reputation and Exposure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ivi3.com/2010/07/theory-reputation-and-exposure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ivi3.com/2010/07/theory-reputation-and-exposure/</link>
	<description>because the world doesn&#039;t need any more self-professed experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernie Menard</title>
		<link>http://blog.ivi3.com/2010/07/theory-reputation-and-exposure/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernie Menard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ivi3.com/?p=78#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Broadly speaking, and as my intent is to further to displace the Google results promogulated by acned mastubatory first and second tier 1l&#039;s, please allow the following:

Reputation is something other people give a person, deserved or not.  Nobody has control over their reputation - all a person can do is to continually do their best.  

Broadly speaking, based on a mere Google, I have greater exposure than do you, and by far.  Most of what you would read about me that is posted by others is less than complimentary.  However, there was absolutely nothing that I could do about it. I will not recant the tale that I had to tell.

What you would not find on Google is what has disappeared about me, among which items would be an online legal periodical that had been available for a couple of years prior to me relating what had actually happened.  The online periodical,  I recall as being associated with a Washinton DC university, had a section titled &#039;Student Cases in the News.&#039; [I actually have the periodical downloaded in a file somewhere.] This periodical had referenced my civil action in the same section following a report of a civil action by a student against a law school.  The article reported that this other student had threatened to blow up the career counselor&#039;s office or something along those lines.  They may as well have labeled the section &#039;Nuts in the News.&#039;  Thankfully, the online legal periodical was taken down within a few months of my beginning to post my chronicle.  

A coincidence about another &#039;legal&#039; oriented site - JDJive I think it was.  Somebody posted on JDJive, in reference to my story during the &#039;discussion&#039; of it, &#039;no wonder Hillary Clinton is so hot for this swamp rat.&#039;  Soon after this somebody bought the site for I believe $25,000 and took it down.  Another coincidence: a  local judges&#039; son who was in the same law school as I at the same time had worked for the Clinton&#039;s.  This same young man now works for President Obama.  If there weren&#039;t houses in the way I could see their house from mine.

The point is, you can do something about an apparently negative online reputation - sometimes it may take a while to determine how to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broadly speaking, and as my intent is to further to displace the Google results promogulated by acned mastubatory first and second tier 1l&#8217;s, please allow the following:</p>
<p>Reputation is something other people give a person, deserved or not.  Nobody has control over their reputation &#8211; all a person can do is to continually do their best.  </p>
<p>Broadly speaking, based on a mere Google, I have greater exposure than do you, and by far.  Most of what you would read about me that is posted by others is less than complimentary.  However, there was absolutely nothing that I could do about it. I will not recant the tale that I had to tell.</p>
<p>What you would not find on Google is what has disappeared about me, among which items would be an online legal periodical that had been available for a couple of years prior to me relating what had actually happened.  The online periodical,  I recall as being associated with a Washinton DC university, had a section titled &#8216;Student Cases in the News.&#8217; [I actually have the periodical downloaded in a file somewhere.] This periodical had referenced my civil action in the same section following a report of a civil action by a student against a law school.  The article reported that this other student had threatened to blow up the career counselor&#8217;s office or something along those lines.  They may as well have labeled the section &#8216;Nuts in the News.&#8217;  Thankfully, the online legal periodical was taken down within a few months of my beginning to post my chronicle.  </p>
<p>A coincidence about another &#8216;legal&#8217; oriented site &#8211; JDJive I think it was.  Somebody posted on JDJive, in reference to my story during the &#8216;discussion&#8217; of it, &#8216;no wonder Hillary Clinton is so hot for this swamp rat.&#8217;  Soon after this somebody bought the site for I believe $25,000 and took it down.  Another coincidence: a  local judges&#8217; son who was in the same law school as I at the same time had worked for the Clinton&#8217;s.  This same young man now works for President Obama.  If there weren&#8217;t houses in the way I could see their house from mine.</p>
<p>The point is, you can do something about an apparently negative online reputation &#8211; sometimes it may take a while to determine how to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

